Trademark Registration & Brand Protection
Your brand is often your most valuable asset. A name, logo, or slogan that distinguishes your business should be protected before competitors capitalize on it.
Whether launching a new company or expanding an existing one, trademark strategy should be addressed early. At Stiberman Legal, PLLC, we assist entrepreneurs and growing businesses with trademark registration and brand protection strategies, guiding clients through the USPTO process and helping secure enforceable rights.
Why Trademark Protection Matters
A trademark identifies the source of your goods or services. It protects the goodwill your business builds over time and prevents competitors from creating marketplace confusion.
Without deliberate trademark strategy, businesses risk investing in branding that may later require costly rebranding or legal defense. Early protection strengthens enforceability, supports expansion, and enhances the long-term value of the brand as a business asset.
Common Law Rights vs. Federal Trademark Registration
Common Law Trademark Rights
Trademark rights in the United States arise from use in commerce, not merely from registration. When a business uses a mark in connection with goods or services, it may acquire "common law" rights within the geographic area where the mark is actually used. However, common law rights are limited in scope. They generally are:
Limited to the territory of actual use
Difficult to enforce across state lines
Harder to prove in litigation
Vulnerable to later federal registrants
A business operating locally may believe it “owns” a name—only to discover that another party has obtained federal registration and nationwide priority.
Federal Trademark Registration
Registering a mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides significant advantages:
Nationwide constructive priority (subject to prior users)
Public notice of ownership
Presumption of validity
Access to federal courts
Basis for international filings
Use of the ® symbol
Without registration, brand disputes can become expensive and uncertain.
Likelihood of Confusion & Clearance Risk
Most trademark refusals and infringement disputes arise from “likelihood of confusion.” The USPTO does not require identical marks to create a conflict. Instead, it evaluates whether consumers are likely to believe the goods or services come from the same source. This analysis considers:
the similarity of the marks in appearance, sound, and meaning;
relatedness of the goods or services;
channels of trade; and
the overall commercial impression.
Even marks that differ slightly in spelling or design may be refused if they create a similar marketplace impression.
Because trademark rights are based on priority of use or filing, clearance is a critical first step. A comprehensive search reviews existing federal registrations, pending applications, and relevant common law usage to assess risk. Filing without clearance increases the likelihood of USPTO refusal, opposition by third parties, or later infringement claims—any of which can force costly rebranding after a business has already invested in marketing and goodwill.
When Should a Trademark Be Filed?
Many businesses begin operating without formal registration. However, doing so creates risk. Without clearance and registration, another business may already own similar rights, early investment in branding may later require rebranding, and expansion into new states may be blocked.
For startups, early clearance prevents investing in a brand that cannot be secured. For established businesses expanding into new markets, proactive filing preserves competitive advantage.
Intent-to-Use vs. Use-Based Applications
Federal applications may be filed under different bases.
Use in Commerce (Section 1(a))
A use-based application is filed when the mark is already being used in interstate commerce. Applicants must provide a specimen demonstrating actual commercial use. This route can proceed more directly toward registration.
Intent-to-Use (Section 1(b))
An intent-to-use application may be filed before launch if there is a bona fide intention to use the mark. This secures a filing date while development continues. However, registration will not issue until actual use begins and a Statement of Use is submitted. For growing businesses, intent-to-use filings can preserve priority while products, branding, or services are finalized.
Protect Your Brand Before It Becomes a Dispute
Whether you are launching a startup, rebranding, or expanding nationally, early trademark planning reduces risk and strengthens enforceability. Provide your proposed mark, intended goods or services, and whether the mark is already in use. We will assess next steps and filing strategy.
Contact Us
(305) 937-2077
contact@stibermanlegal.com
Locations
1946 Harrison Street
Hollywood, FL 33020
1717 K St NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
© 2023 - 2026 Stiberman Legal, PLLC.
All rights reserved.
Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Please consult with an attorney for specific advice regarding your situation, and please refrain from sending us specific information about any matter until you receive written acknowledgment from our end, confirming our representation.


